And to lesser concern, questions about the studio’s own origins and location.
Plus this old gem for good measure: “we do not comment on politics or religion.”
And there’s also the"racist cartoons" controversy.
And there’s more!
Three or four though and you really are rapidly approaching the region of naivety and ignorance.
Fool me twice, and all that.
What is Atomic Heart?
stuff is just marketing; lots of people have that one exact, historically significant, Ukrainian hairstyle!
And changing the release date would, er, require a bit of paperwork?
- but it’s enough circumstantial evidence to know that something here seems, at very best,off.
What’s strange, though, is that all of this sits in quite stark contrast to theactual game.
Its story is a condemnation of Soviet power struggles, corruption, and willful bureaucratic ignorance.
A granny, but she has guns andswears!
All this stuck together like the Homer Simpson Car in playable form.
- instead of being spurred on internally by cohesive design.
Which is a shame because, individually, these disparate parts are often quite good.
Combat, to be fair, is a little rudimentary.
To them, to criticise a game is to criticise all who even thought of playing it.
Never mind the irony of what the game itself is really about.
That’s one, cynical reading, at least - the trouble with Atomic Heart is nobody really knows.
With other games there will be other problems.
It means you should try harder.
